Should the US Army focus on...
Long-duration deployments, rotations, occupations, and combat, taking time to build a robust in-theater force for battlefield dominance?
Lightweight, portable, fast-response in-theater forces with austere footprints that can get in and get out quickly?
Justify your decision below!
By: Brant
Posts
1 comment:
The latter (i.e. "in-and-out"), in the belief that it will be cheaper, scaleable, and less tangled politically. And justified for that reason, don't ask me if the approach would be more effective militarily.
Post a Comment